New EU law based X-border windmill lawsuits.

[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”3.22″][et_pb_row _builder_version=”3.25″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”3.25″ custom_padding=”|||” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.27.4″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat”]

In this case the Belgian State sues the project develloper. before the French administrative authorities. The park is too close. Nice idea to sew Estonian Energy before the Latvian court. Here is the article.

A nice cheap way to protest is to file a EU complaint. In this case against the French State. Before the European Commission. The reason is that France never consulted our country when determining the location of the wind farm in 2016. This goes against the European directive, which states that you must always consult neighboring countries before making such a decision.

Other legal arguments are. Visual nuisance for the inhabitants of the coastal municipalities. The wind farm also interrupts the historic sailing route between the port of Ostend and the British ports. It also causes problems with air traffic. A major impact is on sandbanks. This requires studies and research. You cn read how the sandengine works in the Jaagupi Sadam plaan. downlaod at www.Jaagupie.eujaagupijaagupi


Another major ruling of the EU court you can read in this post: