Päikeseenergia eksponentsiaalne kasv muudab maailma!
Eesti Vabariigi põhiseadus: § 5.Eesti loodusvarad ja loodusressursid on rahvuslik rikkus, mida tuleb kasutada säästlikult. Päike on selge võitja. Tuuleenergia kasutamine on majanduslik ja keskkonnakuritegu.
Päike jätab tuuleenergia ja kõik muu varju
The Economist on selge. Majandusliku mõtlemise peamine reporter ja oli majandusteadlaste jaoks koht arvamuste vahetamiseks alates 1843. aastast. De facto juhend juhtidele.
Kui tuuma- ja tuuleenergia kasvab vaevu ning selle osakaal globaalsest elektritoodangust kahaneb, siis The Economisti teatel kasvab päikeseenergia nii kiiresti, et sellest peaks 2030. aastate keskpaigaks saama planeedi suurim elektriallikas. 2040. aastateks – selle järgmise põlvkonna raames – võib see olla maailma suurim mis tahes liiki energiaallikas, edestades fossiilkütuseid, nagu kivisüsi ja nafta.
https://ourworldindata.org/electricity-mix
Solari graafikuväline globaalne kasv Paigaldatud päikeseenergia võimsus kahekordistub iga kolme aasta tagant, mis tähendab, et see on viimase kümne aasta jooksul kümnekordistunud. The Economist ütleb, et järgmine kümnekordne kasv võrdub kogu maailma tuumareaktorite laevastiku korrutamisega kaheksaga, vähema ajaga, kui tavaliselt kulub ühe neist ehitamiseks. Et anda aimu tööstuse seisvast algusest, teatab The Economist, et 2004. aastal kulus maailmal terve aasta, et paigaldada üks gigavatt päikeseenergia võimsust (umbes piisavalt, et toita väikelinna). Sel aastal peaks see juhtuma iga päev.
Energiaeksperdid ei näinud seda tulemas. The Economist sisaldab graafikut, mis näitab, et iga prognoos, mille Rahvusvaheline Energiaagentuur on teinud päikeseenergia kasvu kohta alates 2009. aastast, on olnud vale. See, mis agentuuri sõnul võtab aega 20 aastat, juhtus vaid kuuega. Märgile kõige lähemal olevad prognoosid tegi Greenpeace – “keskkonnakaitsjad, kes olid innukad ja majanduslikult kirjaoskamatud” –, kuid isegi need prognoosid osutusid tegelikult juhtunust armetult lühikeseks.
Ja päikesepatareide maksumus on langenud nii, nagu kulud tavaliselt teevad, kui kujunemisjärgus tehnoloogiad muutuvad peavooluks. The Economist kirjeldab protsessi nii: Kui toodetud kauba kumulatiivne tootmine suureneb, vähenevad kulud. Kui kulud vähenevad, suureneb nõudlus. Kui nõudlus kasvab, suureneb tootmine ja kulud vähenevad veelgi. Tavaliselt ei saa see jätkuda. Varasematel energiaüleminekutel – puidult kivisöele, kivisöelt naftale ja naftalt gaasile – muutus kütuse leidmine üha kallimaks. Kuid päikesepatareide peamine koostisosa (peale energia) on liiv, räni ja klaasi jaoks. See ei kehti mitte ainult Hiinas, kus toodetakse suurem osa maailma päikesepatareidest, vaid ka Indias, kus on vähe energiat, mida on õnnistatud päikese ja liivaga ning kus toodetakse ja paigaldatakse päikesepatareisid tohutu kiirusega.
Solari samm muutus Rahvusvaheline Energiaagentuur on ühtäkki optimistlik. Selle viimane hinnang, mis avaldati jaanuaris, ütleb, et eelmisel aastal toimus taastuvenergias “samm-sammuline muutus”, mis oli tingitud Hiina päikeseenergia kasutuselevõtust. Aastal 2023 paigaldas Hiina sama palju päikeseenergia võimsust kui kogu maailm 2022. aastal. Maailm on graafikus, et paigaldada järgmise viie aasta jooksul rohkem taastuvenergia võimsust kui kunagi varem viimase 100 aasta jooksul, mis agentuuri sõnul ei ole ikka veel piisav, et jõuda 2050. aastaks netonullheiteni. See vajaks taastuvenergia võimsuse kolmekordistumist järgmise viie aasta jooksul, selle asemel et seda rohkem kui kahekordistada.
IEA Energiaagentuur kommenteeritud dokument:
https://prod.iea.org/reports/renewables-2023/executive-summary
Oxfordi ülikooli energiaspetsialist Rupert Way on modelleerinud “kiire ülemineku” stsenaariumi, kus päikeseenergia ja muude uute tehnoloogiate kulud langevad pidevalt nii, nagu nad on olnud, mitte nii, nagu Rahvusvaheline Energiaagentuur ootab. Ta leiab, et aastaks 2060 on päikeseenergia ülekaalukalt maailma suurim energiaallikas, ületades tuule ja saastevaba vesiniku ning jättes tuumaenergiale lõpmatult väikese rolli.

https://images.theconversation.com/files/604261/original/file-20240702-19-psy4o8.PNG
https://ourworldindata.org/electricity-mix
Oxfordi ülikooli Dokument: Empiiriliselt põhjendatud tehnoloogiaprognoosid ja energiasüsteemi ümberkujundamine.
https://ourworldindata.org/electricity-mix
https://www.cell.com/joule/pdf/S2542-4351(22)00410-X.pdf
The Economisti huvitab kõige rohkem hind – mitte keskkond. See ütleb, et kui millegi hind muutub madalaks, kasutavad inimesed seda palju-palju rohkem. See on kuulus Jevonsi majanduslik paradoks. Kuna energia muutub tõeliselt suureks ja kõike muud kui vabaks, kasutatakse seda asjade jaoks, mida me täna isegi ette ei kujuta. The Economist ütles, et selle vastu panustamine tähendab panustamist kapitalismi vastu.
Jevons’ paradox demand

Palun mõistke nii energia nõudluse kui ka pakkumise poolt!
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921800905001084
Eesti Vabariigi põhiseadus: § 99 selgitab, et valitsuse ülesanne on vähendada inflatsiooni. Kõrged energiahinnad on praegu 80% inflatsiooni põhjuseks.

Roheinflatioon 12%!! EUROSTAT
ORIGINAL:
It is 70 years since at&t’s Bell Labs unveiled a new technology for turning sunlight into power. The phone company hoped it could replace the batteries that run equipment in out-of-the-way places. It also realised that powering devices with light alone showed how science could make the future seem wonderful; hence a press event at which sunshine kept a toy Ferris wheel spinning round and round.
Today solar power is long past the toy phase. Panels now occupy an area around half that of Wales, and this year they will provide the world with about 6% of its electricity—which is almost three times as much electrical energy as America consumed back in 1954. Yet this historic growth is only the second-most-remarkable thing about the rise of solar power. The most remarkable is that it is nowhere near over.
To call solar power’s rise exponential is not hyperbole, but a statement of fact. Installed solar capacity doubles roughly every three years, and so grows ten-fold each decade. Such sustained growth is seldom seen in anything that matters. That makes it hard for people to get their heads round what is going on. When it was a tenth of its current size ten years ago, solar power was still seen as marginal even by experts who knew how fast it had grown. The next ten-fold increase will be equivalent to multiplying the world’s entire fleet of nuclear reactors by eight in less than the time it typically takes to build just a single one of them.
Solar cells will in all likelihood be the single biggest source of electrical power on the planet by the mid 2030s. By the 2040s they may be the largest source not just of electricity but of all energy. On current trends, the all-in cost of the electricity they produce promises to be less than half as expensive as the cheapest available today. This will not stop climate change, but could slow it a lot faster. Much of the world—including Africa, where 600m people still cannot light their homes—will begin to feel energy-rich. That feeling will be a new and transformational one for humankind.
To grasp that this is not some environmentalist fever dream, consider solar economics. As the cumulative production of a manufactured good increases, costs go down. As costs go down, demand goes up. As demand goes up, production increases—and costs go down further. This cannot go on for ever; production, demand or both always become constrained. In earlier energy transitions—from wood to coal, coal to oil or oil to gas—the efficiency of extraction grew, but it was eventually offset by the cost of finding ever more fuel.
As our essay this week explains, solar power faces no such constraint. The resources needed to produce solar cells and plant them on solar farms are silicon-rich sand, sunny places and human ingenuity, all three of which are abundant. Making cells also takes energy, but solar power is fast making that abundant, too. As for demand, it is both huge and elastic—if you make electricity cheaper, people will find uses for it. The result is that, in contrast to earlier energy sources, solar power has routinely become cheaper and will continue to do so.
Other constraints do exist. Given people’s proclivity for living outside daylight hours, solar power needs to be complemented with storage and supplemented by other technologies. Heavy industry and aviation and freight have been hard to electrify. Fortunately, these problems may be solved as batteries and fuels created by electrolysis gradually become cheaper.
Another worry is that the vast majority of the world’s solar panels, and almost all the purified silicon from which they are made, come from China. Its solar industry is highly competitive, heavily subsidised and is outstripping current demand—quite an achievement given all the solar capacity China is installing within its own borders. This means that Chinese capacity is big enough to keep the expansion going for years to come, even if some of the companies involved go to the wall and some investment dries up.
In the long run, a world in which more energy is generated without the oil and gas that come from unstable or unfriendly parts of the world will be more dependable. Still, although the Chinese Communist Party cannot rig the price of sunlight as opec tries to rig that of oil, the fact that a vital industry resides in a single hostile country is worrying.
It is a concern that America feels keenly, which is why it has put tariffs on Chinese solar equipment. However, because almost all the demand for solar panels still lies in the future, the rest of the world will have plenty of scope to get into the market. America’s adoption of solar energy could be frustrated by a pro-fossil-fuel Trump presidency, but only temporarily and painfully. It could equally be enhanced if America released pent up demand, by making it easier to install panels on homes and to join the grid—the country has a terawatt of new solar capacity waiting to be connected. Carbon prices would help, just as they did in the switch from coal to gas in the European Union.
The aim should be for the virtuous circle of solar-power production to turn as fast as possible. That is because it offers the prize of cheaper energy. The benefits start with a boost to productivity. Anything that people use energy for today will cost less—and that includes pretty much everything. Then come the things cheap energy will make possible. People who could never afford to will start lighting their houses or driving a car. Cheap energy can purify water, and even desalinate it. It can drive the hungry machinery of artificial intelligence. It can make billions of homes and offices more bearable in summers that will, for decades to come, be getting hotter.
But it is the things that nobody has yet thought of that will be most consequential. In its radical abundance, cheaper energy will free the imagination, setting tiny Ferris wheels of the mind spinning with excitement and new possibilities.
This week marks the summer solstice in the northern hemisphere. The Sun rising to its highest point in the sky will in decades to come shine down on a world where nobody need go without the blessings of electricity and where the access to energy invigorates all those it touches. ■